Preparation and Evaluation of Viloxazine Hydrochloride Bilayer Matrix Tablets
K. Nagasree1*, Uppalanchi Prashanthi1, Ramya Sri S2
1Department of Pharmaceutics, Samskruti College of Pharmacy,
Affiliated to JNTUH University, Hyderabad 501301, Telangana, India.
2Department of Pharmacy, University College of Technology,
Osmania University, Hyderabad – 500 007, Telangana, India.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: nagasreepharmacy@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
Introduction of matrix tablet as Controlled release (SR) has given a new breakthrough for novel drug delivery system in the field of Pharmaceutical technology. It excludes complex production procedures such as coating and Pelletization during manufacturing and drug release rate from the dosage form is controlled mainly by the type and proportion of polymer used in the preparations.1
Drug release through various matrix system is determined by Water penetration, Polymer swelling, Drug dissolution, Drug diffusion, Matrix erosion have been utilized as formulation sustained release drug delivery.2 Matrix systems made of swellable or nonswellable polymers3.
Matrix devices, due to their chemical inertness, drug embedding ability and drug release character, have gained steady popularity for sustaining the release of a drug.4
Advantages of Matrix Tablets: Easy to manufacture, Versatile, and effective, It has low cost, Can be made to release high molecular weight compounds, Suitable for both non degradable and degradable systems, No danger of dose dumping in case of rupture, Can be fabricated in a wide range of sizes and shapes.5
Matrix tablet was chosen as dosage form because of cost effectiveness. The effect of various grades of HPMC on formulation parameters was evaluated.6
Matrix tablets are considered to be the commercially feasible sustained action dosage forms that involve the least processing variables, utilize the conventional facilities and accommodate large doses of drug.7
Matrix tablets can be defined as the oral solid dosage forms in which the drug is homogeneously dispersed or dissolved within the hydrophilic or hydrophobic polymeric matrices8.
Matrix technologies have often proven popular because of the simplicity of the manufacturing processes required, level of reproducibility, stability of the raw materials, dosage form as well as ease of scale up operation, validation and favorable in-vitro in-vivo correlation.9 Matrix tablets were prepared by wet granulation method using different concentration of Hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC K4M) and Ethyl Cellulose (EC) in alone and combination.10 The polymeric matrix absorbs the water and swells. Finally the drug diffusion occurs by erosion of outer surface of tablet matrix.11
Bilayer tablets are tablets made by compressing several different granulations fed into a die in succession, one on top of another, in layers.12 Cost of the bilayer tablets is lower compared to another oral dosages form13.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Viloxazine hydrochloride procured from Alkem Laboratories Ltd., Mumbai., Provided by Sura Labs, Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad. Cros Povidone, Cross Carmellose, SSG, Kyron T 314, Ethyl cellulose, Carbopol, PVP K 30, MCC, Mg. Stearate, Talc and IPA procured from S.D. Fine Chem. Ltd. Mumbai.
Formulation development of Tablets:
Method of Preparation:
Direct compression was used for preparation of the immediate release layer and wet granulation technology was used for Sustained release layer containing Viloxazine hydrochloride. For both the layer, granulation was carried out separately, as follows:
Preparation of immediate release layer (IR):
All the ingredients were accurately weighed and passed through mesh 60#. In order to mix the ingredients thoroughly drug, superdisintegrant, microcrystalline cellulose, magnesium stearate and talc were mixed in a mortar and pestle. The powder was passed through 60# sieve and compressed on rotary tablet punching machine.
Preparation of sustained release layer (SR):
It was performed by wet granulation method. The required amount of sustained release polymer were blended with Viloxazine hydrochloride and passed through 80 mesh sieve. Binding solution was prepared by dissolving required amount of PVP k 30 in isopropyl alcohol (IPA).Blended powders were granulated with IPA solution and sieved using 40 mesh sieves. The granules were dried at 45˚c for 30 min in tray dryer to evaporate the IPA and then lubricated with required amount of talc, magnesium stearate, store the lubricated granules with suitable label till it’s further used.
Final compression of bilayer tablets:
Bilayer tablets were prepared by feeding 200 mg of SR granules manually into punch and compressed them with pre compression force. Then 100 mg of IR granules were manually fed into same die cavity SR granules and applied final compression force into rotary tablet punching machine.
Table 1: Composition of immediate release layer table
Immediate release layer |
||||||||
Ingredients (MG) |
Formulation |
|||||||
F1 |
F2 |
F3 |
F4 |
F5 |
F6 |
F7 |
F8 |
|
Viloxazine hydrochloride |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
Cros Povidone |
10 |
- |
- |
- |
20 |
- |
- |
- |
Cross Carmellose |
- |
10 |
- |
- |
- |
20 |
- |
- |
SSG |
- |
- |
10 |
- |
- |
- |
20 |
- |
Kyron T 314 |
- |
- |
- |
10 |
- |
- |
- |
20 |
MCC |
29 |
29 |
29 |
29 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
Magnesium Stearate |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Talc |
6 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
Total weight |
150 |
150 |
150 |
150 |
150 |
150 |
150 |
150 |
Table 2: Composition of sustained release layer tablet
Sustained release layer |
||||||||
Ingredients (MG) |
Formulation |
|||||||
F1 |
F2 |
F3 |
F4 |
F5 |
F6 |
F7 |
F8 |
|
Viloxazine hydrochloride |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
Ethyl cellulose |
25 |
50 |
75 |
100 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Carbopol |
- |
- |
- |
- |
25 |
50 |
75 |
100 |
PVP K 30 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
MCC |
154 |
129 |
104 |
79 |
154 |
129 |
104 |
79 |
Mg. Stearate |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Talc |
6 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
IPA |
Q.S |
Q.S |
Q.S |
Q.S |
Q.S |
Q.S |
Q.S |
Q.S |
Total weight |
300 |
300 |
300 |
300 |
300 |
300 |
300 |
300 |
All the quantities were in mg
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Analytical Method
Graphs of Viloxazine hydrochloride were taken in 0.1N HCl and in pH 6.8 phosphate buffer at 221 nm and 225 nm respectively.
Figure 1: Standard graph of Viloxazine hydrochloride in 0.1N HCl
Figure 2: Standard graph of Viloxazine hydrochloride pH 6.8 phosphate buffer (228 nm)
For IR Formulation:
Preformulation parameters of powder blend:
Table 3: Pre compression study of immediate release layer tablets
Formulation Code |
Angle of Repose |
Bulk density (gm/ml) |
Tapped density (gm/ml) |
Carr’s index (%) |
Hausner’s Ratio |
F1 |
26.05±0.65 |
0.307 |
0.444 |
13.46 |
1.16 |
F2 |
25.94±0.56 |
0.384 |
0.434 |
17.85 |
1.22 |
F3 |
26.02±0.61 |
0.267 |
0.307 |
13.33 |
1.15 |
F4 |
26.21±0.93 |
0.346 |
0.404 |
14.35 |
1.16 |
F8 |
26.28±0.33 |
0.323 |
0.376 |
14.09 |
1.16 |
F6 |
25.81±0.61 |
0.393 |
0.453 |
13.24 |
1.15 |
F7 |
26.10±0.53 |
0.318 |
0.368 |
13.58 |
1.16 |
F8 |
26.21±0.32 |
0.312 |
0.358 |
12.84 |
1.15 |
Table 4: Post compression study for IR tablet
Formulation codes |
Weight variation (mg) |
Hardness (kg/cm2) |
Friability (%loss) |
Thickness (mm) |
Drug content (%)
|
Disintegration time of IR tablets (seconds) |
F1 |
146.14 |
4.9 |
0.17 |
3.14 |
98.44 |
45 |
F2 |
150.12 |
4.3 |
0.35 |
3.64 |
99.72 |
31 |
F3 |
147.58 |
3.9 |
0.61 |
3.98 |
98.34 |
25 |
F4 |
150.01 |
4.7 |
0.47 |
3.62 |
96.34 |
20 |
F5 |
147.36 |
3.8 |
0.50 |
3.09 |
98.14 |
38 |
F6 |
149.57 |
4.5 |
0.37 |
3.14 |
99.92 |
16 |
F7 |
148.37 |
4.7 |
0.30 |
3.27 |
97.21 |
26 |
F8 |
150.18 |
4.0 |
0.19 |
3.63 |
95.37 |
20 |
Table 5: In vitro dissolution study of immediate release tablets
Time (minutes) |
Cumulative % Drug release |
|||||||
F1 |
F2 |
F3 |
F4 |
F5 |
F6 |
F7 |
F8 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
39.22 |
41.33 |
43.88 |
49.22 |
47.55 |
43.55 |
38.22 |
42.66 |
20 |
48.59 |
52.71 |
55.38 |
63.58 |
61.9 |
57.40 |
46.33 |
54.33 |
30 |
61.17 |
65.31 |
69.44 |
73.75 |
66.27 |
64.06 |
59.72 |
71.27 |
45 |
72.31 |
76.46 |
78.05 |
86.52 |
82.89 |
75.34 |
71.11 |
83.61 |
60 |
86.33 |
89.60 |
91.75 |
94.97 |
96.33 |
98.35 |
89.88 |
93.57 |
Tablet powder blend was subjected to various pre-formulation parameters. The angle of repose values indicates that the powder blend has good flow properties. The bulk density of all the formulations was found to be in the range of 0.267 to 0.393 (gm/cm3) showing that the powder has good flow properties. The tapped density of all the formulations was found to be in the range of 0.307 to 0.453 showing the powder has good flow properties. The compressibility index of all the formulations was found to be below 17.85 which show that the powder has good flow properties. All the formulations has shown the hausner ratio below 1.22 indicating the powder has good flow properties.
Quality Control parameters for tablets:
Tablet quality control tests such as weight variation, hardness, and friability, thickness, and drug release studies in different media were performed on the compression coated tablet.
The disintegration time of the IR tablets ranged from 45 seconds to 16 seconds. The disintegration time of the IR tablets containing 20mg Cross Carmellose was found to have optimum disintegration time (16 seconds) for IR tablets.
Fig 3: In vitro dissolution study of IR tablets of Viloxazine hydrochloride
The in vitro dissolution study of IR tablets showed that concentration of 20mg Cross Carmellose was found to be optimum for immediate release of Viloxazine hydrochloride. The 20mg concentration of Cros Povidone was found to be releasing the drug slowly when compared to SSG. The 20mg concentration of Cros Povidone released 98.35% at the end of 30minutes. Therefore formulation F6 was optimized and selected for final bilayer tablets.
Tablet powder blend was subjected to various pre-formulation parameters. The angle of repose values indicates that the powder blend has good flow properties. The bulk density of all the formulations was found to be in the range showing that the powder has good flow properties. The tapped density of all the formulations powders has good flow properties. The compressibility index of all the formulations was found to be below 17.99 which show that the powder has good flow properties. All the formulations have shown the hausner ratio below 1.214 indicating the powder has good flow properties.
All the parameters such as weight variation, friability, hardness, thickness and drug content were found to be within limits.
For IR Formulation
Table 6: Pre compression study of sustained release layer tablets
Formulation code |
Angle of repose (Ө) |
Bulk density (gm/cm3 |
Tapped density(gm/cm3) |
Carr’s index (%) |
Hausner’s ratio |
F1 |
28.46 |
0.5710 |
0.6897 |
17.21 |
1.121 |
F2 |
28.48 |
0.5698 |
0.6701 |
14.96 |
1.176 |
F3 |
28.46 |
0.5725 |
0.6909 |
17.14 |
1.206 |
F4 |
28.40 |
0.5702 |
0.6782 |
15.92 |
1.189 |
F5 |
28.71 |
0.5620 |
0.6787 |
17.99 |
1.207 |
F6 |
28.70 |
0.5602 |
0.6698 |
17.11 |
1.196 |
F7 |
28.65 |
0.5562 |
0.6714 |
16.36 |
1.207 |
F8 |
28.80 |
0.5665 |
0.6813 |
16.85 |
1.203 |
All the values represent n=3
Table 7: Post compression study for SR tablet
Formulation codes |
Weight variation (mg) |
Hardness (kg/cm2) |
Friability (%loss) |
Thickness (mm) |
Drug content (%)
|
F1 |
449.36 |
5.1 |
0.86 |
5.15 |
97.14 |
F2 |
447.25 |
5.5 |
0.64 |
5.69 |
99.10 |
F3 |
447.62 |
5.7 |
0.53 |
5.14 |
98.42 |
F4 |
450.04 |
5.9 |
0.42 |
5.55 |
97.21 |
F5 |
448.12 |
5.0 |
0.54 |
5.20 |
99.43 |
F6 |
446.74 |
5.2 |
0.45 |
5.48 |
98.74 |
F7 |
448.37 |
5.9 |
0.36 |
5.92 |
96.45 |
F8 |
449.86 |
6.0 |
0.24 |
5.48 |
98.52 |
In-Vitro Drug release studies
Table 8: Dissolution data of Viloxazine hydrochloride tablets
TIME (H) |
CUMULATIVE % OF DRUG RELEASE |
|||||||
F1 |
F2 |
F3 |
F4 |
F5 |
F6 |
F7 |
F8 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
18.63 |
13.27 |
8.90 |
10.22 |
10.14 |
7.27 |
8.94 |
7.52 |
2 |
29.55 |
16.75 |
12.83 |
15.93 |
14.65 |
14.76 |
16.52 |
19.14 |
3 |
35.84 |
22.41 |
17.94 |
18.51 |
25.93 |
29.28 |
20.54 |
27.92 |
4 |
40.39 |
26.39 |
19.30 |
23.74 |
37.35 |
38.64 |
24.13 |
37.63 |
5 |
46.71 |
29.56 |
22.46 |
29.93 |
43.72 |
50.71 |
34.24 |
45.25 |
6 |
54.05 |
32.81 |
25.62 |
34.45 |
52.72 |
54.72 |
48.15 |
59.25 |
7 |
61.87 |
38.40 |
32.76 |
38.60 |
63.91 |
69.36 |
52.53 |
67.55 |
8 |
67.02 |
42.52 |
37.61 |
45.91 |
74.22 |
72.33 |
61.86 |
70.24 |
9 |
75.12 |
48.75 |
45.85 |
47.59 |
83.18 |
81.46 |
74.95 |
74.73 |
10 |
82.21 |
56.16 |
50.96 |
56.75 |
89.24 |
88.76 |
79.74 |
81.63 |
11 |
89.50 |
73.39 |
62.35 |
60.32 |
91.74 |
90.85 |
86.53 |
84.95 |
12 |
98.14 |
85.54 |
78.14 |
66.83 |
99.43 |
93.96 |
91.62 |
89.85 |
The results of In vitro dissolution study of SR tablets showed that
The formulation F1-F4 containing Ethyl cellulose had released the drug 98.14% in 12 hours.
The formulation F5-F7 containing Carbopol (25mg) had released the drug 99.43% in 12 hours.
Based on the comparative release profile, formulation F5 was selected for the final bilayer tablets.
In vitro Dissolution Study of Viloxazine Hydrochloride In Bilayer Tablet
Fig 4: In vitro dissolution study of Viloxazine hydrochloride in bilayer tablet
Application of Release Rate Kinetics to Dissolution Data:
Various models were tested for explaining the kinetics of drug release. To analyze the mechanism of the drug release rate kinetics of the dosage form, the obtained data were fitted into zero-order, first order, Higuchi, and Korsmeyer-Peppas release model.
Fig 5: Zero order release kinetics graph
In Higuchi diffusion kinetics the R2 value was near to 1. So it was concluded that the optimized formulation follows Zero order release kinetics mechanism.
Drug – Excipient compatibility studies
Fourier Transform-Infrared Spectroscopy:
CONCLUSION:
Success of the in vitro drug release studies recommends the product for the further In vivo studies, which may improve patient compliance.
Viloxazine hydrochloride potentiates the effect of Neurodevelopmental disorders. Hence the bilayer tablets of Viloxazine hydrochloride were used to improve patient compliance towards the effective management Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
From the results, formulated bilayer tablet provides better in vitro release from immediate release layer as well as sustained release layer.
From the results, formulated bilayer tablet provides better in vitro release from immediate release layer as well as sustained release layer.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
Thе Authors arе thankful to Principal, Department of Pharmacy, Samskruti College of Pharmacy, Hyderabad, for extending the support to carry out the research work. Finally, the authors express their gratitude to the Sura Labs, Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad, for providing research equipment and facilities.
REFERENCES:
1. Dr. Y. Krishna Reddy, Ch. Asha. Formulation and Evaluation of Oral Controlled Release Matrix Tablets of Propranolol Hydrochloride. Asian J. Pharm. Res. 2020; 10(2):81-85. doi: 10.5958/2231-5691.2020.00015.5
2. hankar B. Kalbhare, Vivek Kumar Redasani, Mandar J. Bhandwalkar, Rohit K. Pawar, Avinash M. Bhagwat. Role of Aminated derivatives of Natural Gum in Release Modulating Matrix Systems of Losartan Potassium: Optimization of Formulation using Box-Behnken Design. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2021; 11(2):73-4. doi: 10.52711/2231-5691.2021.00015
3. Soujanya Kumari, Ravi Kumar, Yamunappa, Pooja Shetty, Prathibha Suvarna, Narayana Swamy VB. Formulation and Evaluation of Gastro Retentive Matrix Tablets of Sitagliptin. Asian J. Res. Pharm. Sci. 6(1): Jan.-Mar., 2016; Page 1-14. doi: 10.5958/2231-5659.2016.00001.1
4. Basavaraj, Someswara Rao B, S.V Kulkarni, Pramod Patil , Chetan Surpur. Design and Characterization of Sustained Release Aceclofenac Matrix Tablets Containing Tamarind Seed Polysaccharide. Asian J. Pharm. Tech. 1(1): Jan.-Mar. 2011; Page 17-21.
5. Poonam R. Songire, Smita S. Aher, R. B. Saudagar. Recent Research on Matrix Tablets for Controlled Release – A Review. Asian J. Pharm. Tech. 2015; Vol. 5( 4): 214-221. doi: 10.5958/2231-5713.2015.00031.8
6. Godbole Ajeet Madhukar, Patel Bhautik V, Somnache Sandesh Narayan, Prajapati Ashish R, Yadav Pradeep. Optimization of Various Grades of HPMC for Development of Sustained Release Matrix Tablets of Theophylline. Asian J. Pharm. Tech. 2017; 7(1): 19-26. doi: 10.5958/2231-5713.2017.00004.6
7. Dr. Y. Krishna Reddy, A. Nagaraju. Formulation and In vitro Evaluation of Sustained Release Matrix Tablet of Azathioprine. Asian J. Pharm. Tech. 2020; 10(2):65-70. doi: 10.5958/2231-5713.2020.00013.6
8. A. Bhavani, B. Hemalatha, K. Padmalatha. Formulation development and in vitro Evaluation of sustained release matrix tablets of Cefpodoxime proxetil. Asian Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2021; 11(4):273-8. doi: 10.52711/2231-5713.2021.00045.
9. Shyamala Bhasakran, Preethi Sudheer. Minitablet: A Novel Approach for Oral Extended Release. Research J. Pharma. Dosage Forms and Tech. 2009; 1(3):263-268.
10. Amit K. Jain, Rajput Rammulrajsinh, Pradeep Agrawal, Kinal patel. Design and Evaluation of Sustained Release Matrix Tablets of Ibuprofen. Research J. Pharma. Dosage Forms and Tech. 2011; 3(4):142-147.
11. Hamid Khan, Mushir Ali, Alka Ahuja, Javed Ali. Formulation and In-Vitro Evaluation of In-lay Matrix Tablets Containing Telmisartan and Hydrochlorothiazide. Res. J. Pharm. Dosage Form. and Tech. 7(3): July-Sept., 2015; Page 193-198. doi: 10.5958/0975-4377.2015.00029.4
12. Bilayer Tablets – A Review of State of Art. Svapnil Sanghavi, Misam Polara, Manish Patel, Jayvadan Patel, Niral Shah. Research J. Pharma. Dosage Forms and Tech. 2012; 4(3): 160-165.
13. Mayuri B. Patil, Priyanka M. Salve, Shital V. Sonawane, Avish D. Maru, Jayshree S. Bhadane, Rajendra K. Surawase. Technologies in Bilayer Tablet Manufacturing: A Review. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms and Technology. 2021; 13(3):253-258. doi: 10.52711/0975-4377.2021.00042
Received on 08.10.2022 Modified on 07.11.2022
Accepted on 25.11.2022 ©AJRC All right reserved
Asian J. Research Chem. 2023; 16(1):91-96.
DOI: 10.52711/0974-4150.2023.00015